As much as we pay tribute to our late brothers and sisters I think it will be important to remind the ignorant mass of what happened that fateful day. We all know that what happened on 9/12 wasn’t a structural failure but controlled demolition. Those responsible are trying by all means to hide the truth but one day in God’s time, they will be exposed. God almighty will vindicate the SCOAN and its founder, Prophet T.B. Joshua. Be blessed as you read in Jesus’name:

On September 12, 2014, a six-storey building suddenly collapsed on the premises of the Synagogue Church of All Nations (SCOAN) located in Ikotun in Lagos State, south-west Nigeria

CCTV scoan building collapse scoan building collapse

Reasons for the explosion

Various reasons have been postulated for the collapse of the building. This has also led to the Lagos State government setting up a judicial investigating panel to find out the true cause of the collapse. Both the church and the Lagos State government have put forward different reasons for the collapse of the building.

The Lagos State government said the reason for the collapse was poor construction standards used by the church’s engineers, and the church has attributed the collapse to a terrorist attack with explosives and a controlled demolition.

Having looked at all the reasons and visited the scene of the collapse, and analysed the video footage of the preceding moments before the collapse of the structure, one can deduce that the collapse resulted from a high energy infra-sound absorption by the building leading to a high energy resonance of the constituent atoms of the building.

This is even more accurate based on the fact that all other options being put forward were eliminated scientifically; creating what appears to be a mystery due to limited knowledge surrounding the collapse of the building.

Structural failure

The structural failure option cannot hold scientifically because, upon the inspection of the building, it was observed that the foundation columns were still intact, with no stress or cracks on the steel and concrete pillars protruding from the earth. This was also confirmed by the laboratory tests done by the Lagos State Materials Testing Laboratory.

The CCTV footage showed a collapse that is not consistent with other known buildings that have collapsed as a result of structural failure. The controlled demolition/placement of explosives theory cannot also hold because when the word controlled demolition is used, it elicits a set of known protocols which cannot be executed clandestinely.

Analysis of the video footage indicated the absence of any chemical explosives, due to the absence of a thermal shock wave and its attendant sudden rise in temperature. There was an absence of carbonation from expected combustion and burning of the structure and surrounding buildings and tents.

Consequently, I am 100 per cent certain that samples taken from the debris for chemical explosives residue analysis will return NEGATIVE.


Infrasound, sometimes referred to as low-frequency sound, is lower in frequency than 20 Hertz or cycles per second. Hearing becomes gradually less sensitive as frequency decreases, so for humans to perceive infrasound, the sound pressure must be sufficiently high.

The ear is the primary organ for sensing infrasound, but at higher intensities, it is possible to feel infrasound vibrations in various parts of the body. The study of such sound waves is referred to as INFRASONIC, covering sounds beneath 20 Hz down to 0.001 Hz.This frequency range is utilised for monitoring earthquakes, charting rock and petroleum formations below the earth and studying the mechanics of the heart.

In the military application, infrasound is exploited for its weapon capabilities and was used by the allies in World War I to locate artillery. They include highly directional devices which can transmit painful, audible sound into an individual’s ear at great distances and infrasonic generators which can shoot acoustic projectiles hundreds of metres, causing a blunt impact upon a target.

Infra-sound as a powerful ultra low frequency weapon could be directional and tenable, penetrating buildings and vehicles. High intensity infra-sound could induce disorientation and reduced sensory motor functions. The highest levels can cause a person’s bones to resonate, which can be quite painful.


To understand how sound can become a deadly weapon of destruction, a review of the resonance principle was looked at. All of the chemical reactions in the cells of living organisms or in non-living materials at the atomic level are caused by the electromagnetic oscillations, pulsations and vibrations, which are collectively referred to as vibrational frequencies.

Once resonance has been achieved, an energy exchange takes place on the surface of the membrane of each cell or atom. If the source of energy is more powerful, it directly impacts the targeted material, resulting in a biological reaction or in this case a physical one.

Resonance can be induced electromagnetically by an infrasonic pulse generator, which can establish a link, for instance, to a building such as the SCOAN’s that collapsed

Once this connection occurs, the power level of the generator can be increased, which will automatically transfer the energy to the building. If the power or intensity level is high or very high, the building can suffer a crumbling collapse


As it is, it can be concluded scientifically that there was no explosives in the building when it collapsed upon the post blast analysis done. It can also be true to safely say the said building didn’t come down as a result of structural failure, because its collapse was not consistent with known cases of building collapsing structurally, coupled with the fact that the foundational pillars showed no sign of stress so far.

So, what caused the building to collapse? It’s been known that sonic and infrasonic weapons exist. It’s also known in the weapons research community that certain nations had taken it to the next level.How high that level is I do not know, but certainly science tells us that infrasound weaponised with high enough intensity can cause vibrations to structures at the atomic level, causing the kind of destruction we saw on the SCOAN premises.

This article was last published in the International Journal of Scientific Research Paul Biedomo Iguniwei is a lecturer at the Kaduna Polytechnic College of Science and Technology, Applied Science Department. He is also an MSc Student of Material Science and Explosives at the Nigerian Defence Academy, Post-Graduate School. Kaduna, Nigeria.

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

wtc building scoan


For the video clip go to

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

  1. Rapid onset of collapse
  2. Sounds of explosions
  3. Symmetrical structural failure
  4. Free-fall acceleration through the path of what was the greatest resistance
  5. Imploded, collapsing completely, landing almost in its own footprint
  6. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic
  7. Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional
  8. Foreknowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the aftermath of WTC7’s destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendiary devices was discovered:

  1. FEMAfinds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
  2. Several tonnes of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses
  3. Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

  1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
  2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
  3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
  4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsedwtc building explode

As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers’ destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

  1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
  2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
  3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
  4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
  5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
  6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
  7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
  8. 1200-foot-diameterdebris field: no “pancaked” floors found
  9. Isolated explosive ejections 20–40 stories below demolition front
  10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
  11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
  12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
  13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

The three high-rises exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

  1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
  2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
  3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
  4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer-lasting fires have never collapsed


Perhaps the most important piece of evidence that Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition is the building’s downward acceleration at absolute free-fall, with sudden onset, for the first few seconds of its collapse.

As documented in the video footage of Building 7’s collapse, the building traveled downward at free-fall acceleration, with sudden onset, for over 100 feet, over a period of approximately 2.5 seconds, based on measurements at the northeast corner of the building. This fact of a period of absolute free-fall was acknowledged by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in its final report on Building 7, which was issued in November 2008.1 In its draft report for public comment, in August, 2008, NIST had claimed that Building 7’s downward motion was 40 percent slower than free-fall, a statement which is blatantly untrue.2 NIST changed its characterization of Building 7’s downward motion after a high school physics teacher posted a direct measurement of the motion of the building on YouTube3 and challenged NIST’s assertions in a public comment at NIST’s technical briefing.  The measurements incontrovertibly show Building 7 undergoing absolute free-fall.

The significance of free-fall is that a building cannot undergo free-fall if it is meeting any resistance from the structure below it. Any resistance from the structure below will slow the building’s descent.

In an attempt to deny that Building 7 underwent free-fall—before finally acknowledging free-fall in its final report—NIST’s Lead Investigator, Dr. Shyam Sunder, stated at NIST’s technical briefing that, “Free-fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it…[but, referring to Building 7]…There was structural resistance that was provided in this particular case. And you had a sequence of structural failures that had to take place and everything was not instantaneous.”4 Sunder is correctly explaining why free-fall could not happen in the case of a natural collapse. The fact that free-fall did occur is very strong evidence that this was not a natural collapse. NIST’s final report acknowledges 2.25 seconds of free-fall, described as a “more detailed” analysis, but continues incoherently to support its earlier 40% slower than free-fall analysis as well. NIST fails to deal in any way with the plain implications of free-fall.

The fact that Building 7 underwent free-fall means that none of the building’s potential energy was used to crush the structure below it. All of its potential energy was converted directly into energy of motion (kinetic energy), leaving no energy to do anything else. Therefore, the lower section of the building could not have been crushed by the falling section. The destruction of at least 8 stories of the lower section of the building had to have been accomplished by other means to allow the upper section of the building to fall through it in free-fall.

NIST’s theory is that the failure of a single column near the east end of the building caused neighbouring columns to fail in a progressive manner. This is contradicted by the observed simultaneous collapse across the entire width of the building, which fell with a level roofline. A progressive collapse mechanism would have led to a progression of failures, visible deformation of the building, and gradual, asymmetrical collapse. This is what NIST’s computer model shows, but it is not what was observed. What we observed was the sudden onset of free-fall across the entire width of the building, which can only be achieved by controlled demolition.

Dr. Sunder was correct to argue that the building should have fallen slower than free-fall if it was a natural collapse. That it fell at free-fall means that it was not.

Comparison of WTC Building 7 and SCOAN Collapsed Building

scoan collapse compare wtc

comparing scoan wtc[1] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7,” Washington, DC. November 2008. p.45

[2] NIST, “Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 – Draft for Public Comment,” Washington, DC. August 2008. Chapter 3 p.41.


[4] NIST WTC 7 Technical Briefing, August 26, 2008. Transcript p.16

This post was sent to us by Xavier Mudzunga


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s